Write your message
Volume 14, Issue 4 (Winter 2025)                   Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2025, 14(4): 496-521 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mollaei S, Babaei M, Khalili B, Khezri M. The Factors Affecting the Implementation of Building Retrofitting Projects in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2025; 14 (4) :496-521
URL: http://dpmk.ir/article-1-705-en.html
1- Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bonab, Bonab, Iran.
2- Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 10468 kb]   (155 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1627 Views)
Full-Text:   (126 Views)
Introduction
Since Iran is one of the earthquake-prone countries and, unfortunately, has suffered high casualties by earthquakes, the retrofitting of buildings in Iran is a fundamental necessity. According to records, major earthquakes in Iran occur every five years on average, resulting in significant human and financial losses. Increasing knowledge of seismic activity, public education, promoting safety culture, and assessing the vulnerability of strategic buildings are effective in reducing financial and human casualties from earthquakes.
The primary standard for reducing earthquake risks is the seismic design code applied in the design and construction phases. The regulations specify seismic design levels and performance criteria for buildings under expected ground motions, aiming to prevent life loss and minimize the direct and indirect economic and social consequences. However, some designed structures can still be vulnerable to specific seismic forces. The necessity of retrofitting a building or structure is not solely dependent on its age; there are cases where buildings undergo retrofitting even before they are put into operation. This is more important in big cities with high population density, where the likelihood of casualties and financial loss during an earthquake increases.
Most of previous studies in the field of seismic retrofitting and strengthening in Iran have focused on various methods to improve the seismic behavior of buildings. However, the challenges of implementing these methods and their acceptance by those involved in the construction industry have been neglected. In this regard, this research examines the perspectives of responsible officials in renovation and seismic retrofitting projects, contractors, and stakeholders regarding the existing challenges in retrofitting buildings in East Azerbaijan province, Iran. We seek to identify the factors affecting the implementation of building retrofitting projects.

Methods
This is a descriptive survey study. After familiarization with the execution process of building retrofitting projects and identifying the challenges based on the opinions of 5 experts from the organization for development, renovation and equipping of schools (DRES) of Iran, the identified items (n=30) were used in designing a questionnaire. The questionnaire was then completed by 6 technical experts, 15 project supervisors, and 23 contractors in East Azerbaijan province to determine the main issues that require attention for the successful implementation of retrofitting projects. Finally, practical solutions for each challenge were provided to address the barriers to retrofitting projects in East Azerbaijan province.

Results
According to technical experts, “inappropriate allocation of budgets” was deemed the most significant challenge (54.5). According to the contractors, “delays in payments and getting involved in administrative processes” was the most important challenge [87]. According to the project supervisors, “the lack of skilled and experienced contractors in specialized projects” was the most important one [85]. The “lack of a specialized cost list” was another important matter that seems to cause many financial disagreements in retrofitting projects.
The proposed solutions included the establishment of transparent budget allocation processes, the formation of groups for developing detailed specialized cost lists, the streamlining of project handover procedures, the improvement of workshop facilities, and the implementation of robust project coordination frameworks. 

Conclusion
This study unveils the key challenges in building retrofitting projects in East Azerbaijan province, Iran, and offers practical solutions to enhance the implementation of these projects. The findings can be valuable for project managers, policymakers, and stakeholders involved in construction projects. 

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

All participants in this study have become aware of the research process, the confidentiality of their information, the right to withdraw from the research at any time, and how the research findings will be published.

Funding
The paper was extracted from the master thesis of  Behroz Khalili, approved by University of Bonab, Bonab, Iran.

Authors' contributions
Conceptualization: Somayeh Mollaei; Methodology: Behroz Khalili and Somayeh Mollaei; Investigation: Behroz Khalili; Software and data collection: Behroz Khalili and Somayeh Mollaei; Writing the original draft: Milad Khezri and Somayeh Mollaei; Writing review and editing: Mehdi Babaei and Milad Khezri.

Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.


References
Ahmed, A., Mateo-Garcia, M., McGough, D., & Gaterell, M. (2017). Methodology for evaluating innovative technologies for low-energy retrofitting of public buildings. Energy Procedia, 112, 166-175.‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1078]
Aloini, D., Dulmin, R., Mininno, V., & Ponticelli, S. (2012). Supply chain management: A review of implementation risks in the construction industry. Business Process Management Journal, 18(5), 735-761.‏ [DOI:10.1108/14637151211270135]
Anelli, A., Santa-Cruz, S., Vona, M., Tarque, N., & Laterza, M. (2019). A proactive and resilient seismic risk mitigation strategy for existing school buildings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 15(2), 137-151.‏ [DOI:10.1080/15732479.2018.1527373]
Aslani, F., Amini Hosseini, K., & Fallahi, A. (2019). Evaluation of physical resilience of Karaj city against earthquake. Journal of Rescue and Relief, 11(1), 68-71.‏ [DOI:10.52547/jorar.11.1.68]
Balkaya, C. (2018). Information systems for repair alternatives and initial cost estimation of damaged building structures. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, 4(2), 81-89.‏ [Link]
Bhattarai, S. K., Rayamajhi, L., Lamichhane, S., & Arayal, S. (2024). Navigating delays: A comprehensive study of public building retrofitting projects in Kathmandu valley. Journal of UTEC Engineering Management (JUEM), 2(1), 37-52.‏ [DOI:10.36344/utecem.2024.v02i01.004]
Carofilis Gallo, W. W., Clemett, N., Gabbianelli, G., O’Reilly, G., & Monteiro, R. (2022). Seismic resilience assessment in optimally integrated retrofitting of existing school buildings in Italy. Buildings, 12(6), 845.‏ [DOI:10.3390/buildings12060845]
Gino, D., Anerdi, C., Castaldo, P., Ferrara, M., Bertagnoli, G., & Giordano, L. (2020). Seismic upgrading of existing reinforced concrete buildings using friction pendulum devices: A probabilistic evaluation. Applied Sciences, 10(24), 8980.‏ [DOI:10.3390/app10248980]
Ghaemmaghami, P., & Rahaei, O. (2013). [Environment and sustainable strategies in design of future buildings (Persian)]. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 15(2), 135-146. [Link]
Grant, D., Bommer, J. J., Pinho, R., & Calvi, G. M. (2006). Defining priorities and timescales for seismic intervention in school buildings in Italy. IUSS Monograph.‏[Link]
Hamidizadeh, S., Ahmadi, F., Aslani, Y., Etemadifar, S., Salehi, K., & Kordeyazdi, R. (2008). [Study effect of a group-based exercise program on the quality of life in older men and women in 2006-2007 (Persian)]. The Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, 16(1), 167. [Link]
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. California: SAGE Publications. [Link]
Huo, X., Hao, T., & Jiao, L. (2023). Critical risk factors of public building green retrofit projects-an empirical study in Chongqing, China. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1-13.‏ [DOI:10.1080/13467581.2023.2278886]
Deputy of the President for Strategic Planning and Supervision. (2013). [Guidelines for seismic retrofitting of existing buildings (Persian)]. Tehra: Deputy of the President for Strategic Planning and Supervision. [Link]
Kalantari, A., & Davodi, M. (2012). [A review of geotechnical hazards and structural damage in the Ahar-Varzeghan earthquakes of August 11, 2012 (Persian)]. Research Bulletin of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 15(4), 55. [Link]
Liu, T., Ma, G., & Wang, D. (2022). Pathways to successful building green retrofit projects: Causality analysis of factors affecting decision making. Energy and Buildings, 276, 112486.‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112486]
Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. (2023). [General Directorate of Culture and Islamic Guidance of East Azerbaijan Province (Persian)]. Retrieved from: [Link]
Mahbobi Niazmandi, M., Mirasi, S., Nakhaei, ., & Gholmpoor A. (2012). [A new method to enhance the accuracy in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (Persian)]. Paper presented at: 4th International Conference on Seismic Retrofitting (Earthquake Engineering and new Technology on Retrofitting, Tabriz, Iran, 2 May 2012. [Link]
Maio, R., Estêvão, J. M., Ferreira, T. M., & Vicente, R. (2020). Cost-benefit analysis of traditional seismic retrofitting strategies integrated in the renovation of stone masonry buildings. Engineering Structures, 206, 110050.‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110050]
Mirzaei, S., Tafti, A. A. D., Mohammadinia, L., Nasiriani, K., Rahaei, Z., & Falahzadeh, H., et al. (2020). Operational strategies for establishing disaster-resilient schools: A qualitative study. Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine, 4(2), e23. [Link]
O’Meara, P., Pendergast, C., & Robinson, A. (2007). Grassroots community engagement: the key to success in a community building program. Rural Society, 17(2), 155-164.‏ [DOI:10.5172/rsj.351.17.2.155]
Panza, G. F., & Bela, J. (2020). NDSHA: A new paradigm for reliable seismic hazard assessment. Engineering Geology, 275, 105403.‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105403]
Papadopoulos, G. A., Zamer, N., Gayialis, S. P., & Tatsiopoulos, I. P. (2016). Supply chain improvement in construction industry. Universal Journal of Management, 4(10), 528-534.‏ [DOI:10.13189/ujm.2016.041002]
Pardo-Bosch, F., Cervera, C., & Ysa, T. (2019). Key aspects of building retrofitting: Strategizing sustainable cities. Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 109247. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.018] [PMID]
Rahaei, O., & Ghaem Maghami, P. (2013). [Environment and sustainable measures in the design of future buildings (Persian)]. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 15(2), 135-146. [Link]
Sadrmomtazi, A., Gashti, S. H., & Tahmouresi, B. (2020). Residual strength and microstructure of fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete exposed to high temperatures. Construction and Building Materials, 230, 116969.‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116969]
Sajid, H. U., Ashraf, M., Ali, Q., & Sajid, S. H. (2018). Effects of vertical stresses and flanges on seismic behavior of unreinforced brick masonry. Engineering Structures, 155, 394-409.‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.013]
Seidbeigi, S., Nasiri, M., Berazan Lotfi, S., & Rasouli H. (2019). [Reducing vulnerability of informal settlements of Farahzad neighborhood against Tehran's possible earthquake (Persian)]. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge, 9 (2), 193-206. [Link]
Soghrat, M. R., & Ziyaeifar, M. (2019). Development of short return period spectra for the regions with high to moderate seismicity: An example in Iran. Journal of Seismology, 23, 521-536.‏ [DOI:10.1007/s10950-019-09821-6]
Sleiman, E. (2021). Seismic retrofitting of existing buildings by strengthening of masonry infill walls [PhD dissertation]. Lyon: Université de Lyon.‏ [Link]
Tomar, A., Paul, D. K., & Agarwal, P. (2018). Correlation between computed stress response and observed damage of a heritage masonry building. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 12(01), 1850002.‏ [DOI:10.1142/S1793431118500021]
Yang, E. T. A. (2022). Safety Culture in Construction Industry [MA thesis]. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.‏ [Link]
Zarei, Y., & Estelaji, A. (2016). [Explore the effects of earthquakes on residential buildings in rural areas Shonbeh and Tasooj District (Persian)]. Geography (Regional Planning), 6(24), 33-52. [Link]
Zhang, M., Lian, Y., Zhao, H., & Xia-Bauer, C. (2020). Unlocking green financing for building energy retrofit: A survey in the western China. Energy Strategy Reviews, 30, 100520.‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2020.100520]
Zhang, Z., Chong, A., Pan, Y., Zhang, C., & Lam, K. P. (2019). Whole building energy model for HVAC optimal control: A practical framework based on deep reinforcement learning. Energy and Buildings, 199, 472-490.‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.07.029]
Zhou, Z., Zhang, S., Wang, C., Zuo, J., He, Q., & Rameezdeen, R. (2016). Achieving energy efficient buildings via retrofitting of existing buildings: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(5), 3605-3615.‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.046]
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/07/30 | Accepted: 2024/09/7 | ePublished: 2025/02/28

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge (quarterly)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb