Write your message
Volume 14, Issue 2 (Summer 2024)                   Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2024, 14(2): 158-177 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Esfandiari Darabad F, Vahabzadeh Zargari M, Nezafat Takle B, Abidi Hamlabad S. Predicting the Magnitude of Possible Earthquakes in the Shahrood District of Khalkhal County, Ardabil, Iran, Using Artificial Neural Networks. Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2024; 14 (2) :158-177
URL: http://dpmk.ir/article-1-668-en.html
1- Department of Geography (Geomorphology ), Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 12555 kb]   (184 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (5054 Views)
Full-Text:   (107 Views)
Introduction
From ancient times, following natural disasters, mankind has sought solutions to prevent or control these disasters. Earthquakes are one of these natural disasters that have always caused financial and human losses. The time, place, and magnitude of the earthquakes are the three main parameters of the earthquake assessment. To control and minimize its adverse effects, a good estimate of their values ​​should be available (Arjamand et al., 2015). Earthquake is a natural hazard with sudden shaking of the ground, which is of particular importance for human societies in terms of magnitude and area of destruction, unpredictability, and occurrence in a very short time (Gholami and Shokuhi Bidandi, 2023). For earthquake prediction, it is necessary to consider the time, place, magnitude, probability, and reason for its occurrence. The purpose of earthquake prediction is to help disaster management organizations prepare for earthquakes. When a strong earthquake is predicted, disaster management organizations should be alerted to take preventive measures. In disaster preparedness, decisions and activities focus on damage prevention. Various earthquake prediction techniques have been applied to mitigate damages (Bhatia et al., 2023). 
Shahrood, a district of Khalkhal county, Ardabil, Iran, is an area vulnerable to earthquakes due to the existence of geological formations with heterogeneous resistance, being located on an alluvial plain with less resistance than the thick bedrock, and being surrounded by numerous faults. Also, due to being located in the folded zone of Western Alborz and Azerbaijan, different faults in the region have been formed, the most important of which are Talash fault, Neor fault, and Shahooud Kalur fault. This research aims to predict the magnitude of possible earthquakes in the Shahrood district of Khalkhal County using artificial neural networks.

Methods
This research used various data and information, including the geological map of Rezvanshahr, Khalkhal, and Masuleh counties with a scale of 1:100,000, from which the map of faults and geological formations was extracted. ALOS-PALSAR digital elevation model with a spatial resolution of 12.5 m and Sentinel-2 satellite images were used to identify geological features. For finding different characteristics of earthquakes, the 30-year seismic data from the Institute of Geophysics of the University of Tehran and the global seismic data from the US Geological Survey were used, which included date of occurrence, magnitude, focal depth, and geographic coordinates. The selection of a 30-year period was due to the existence of complete data. For the period of more than 30 years, the data were mostly incomplete. All the data used for the preparation in the first stage were entered into the ArcGIS software and preliminary processing was done on all neural layers. After the preprocessing, the modeling is done using SPSS Modeler software.

Results 
For modeling the input data for the network, the data was split into two sets; 70% for training and 30% for testing. Five criteria were determined for predicting earthquake magnitude: Earthquake focal depth, magnitude of previous earthquakes, distance of the faults from the occurrence points, location of previous earthquakes, and fault length. After designing the model and configuring the network, the data was processed, and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network was created with 5 input neurons, 3 hidden neurons, and 1 output neuron. This model achieved an accuracy of 98.2%, indicating its high precision in processing data for predicting earthquake magnitude. The results indicated that, in the MLP model, the highest effect (0.83) was related to the magnitude of previous earthquakes, followed by the distance of the faults (0.58) and the focal depth of earthquakes (0.42). The lowest effects were related to the location of previous earthquakes (0.25) and fault length (0.18). The MLP model was finally found to have high validity and reliability in both training and testing phases.

Conclusion
The prediction results showed that earthquakes with a magnitude of 1-3 on the Richter scale are very likely to occur and the possibility of their occurrence on faults, especially the Kalur fault, is very high (70%). Although earthquakes with this magnitude have low risk, their occurrence in shallow depths and close to residential areas can cause mortality and financial loss. Also, earthquakes with a magnitude of 4-6 on the Richter scale have a moderate probability of occurrence (26%). These earthquakes can cause a lot of damage in the region. Moreover, the likelihood of earthquakes with a magnitude of 7-10 on the Richter scale in the area is 4%, indicating a low probability. In future studies, it is recommended to use machine learning models to better and more accurately predict earthquakes in the studied area.

Ethical Considerations

Compliance with ethical guidelines

All ethical principles were observed in this study.

Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors' contributions
The authors contributed equally to preparing this paper.

Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the National Center for Seismology of Iran and the Institute of Geophysics of the University of Tehran, for providing important data and information to carry out this research.




References
Arjomand, M. A., Mahmoudi, J., Rezaei, M., & Mohammadi, M. H. (2016). [The earthquake magnitude prediction using multilayer perceptron neural network (Persian)]. Modares Civil Engineering Journal, 16(4), 1-8. [Link]
Ahmadi Namin, M., & Kazemian, A. (2023). [Study of the relationship between earthquakes and weather in recent earthquakes in Iran (Persian)]. Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering, 10(2), 129-141. [DOI: 10.48303/bese.2022.553375.1075]
Berberian, M., & King, G. C. P. (1981). Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 18(2), 210-265. [Link]
Dana, T., Lelahizade, B., Hemmasi, A., & Aghamohammadi, H. (2020). [Vulnerability assessment of Tehran Municipality District 8 against earthquake (Persian)]. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge, 10(2), 177-186. [Link]
Esfandyari, F., Gafari, A., & Lotfi, K. (2014). [Vulnerability assessment citiesnear by faultsusing TOPSIS Method & GIS: A Case Study of Ardabil (Persian)]. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 3(4), 17-33. [DOI:10.22111/jneh.2014.2466]
Esfandiari, F., Ghafari Gilande, A., & Lotfi, Kh. (2018). [Investigating the seismic power of faults and estimating human casualties caused by earthquakes in urban areas, a case study: (Ardebil city)(Persian)]. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 2(4), 17-36. [Link]
Gandomi, M., Dolatshahi, Pirooz, M., Varjavand, I., & Nikoo, M. R. (2019). [Application of multilayer perceptron neural network and support vector machine for modeling the hydrodynamic behavior of permeable breakwaters with Porous Core (Persian)]. Marine Engineering, 15(29) , 167-179. [Link]
Gholami, H., & Shokohi Bidhandi, M., S. (2023). [Relative evaluation of the vulnerability of urban areas of Khorramabad in terms of earthquakes using hierarchical analysis method (Persian)]. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge, 12(4), 481-499. [Link]
Hayati, S., Gholami, Y., Esmaeili, A., & Razavinejhad, M. (2017). [Predicting the location of a possible earthquake in Khorasan Razavi Province by Using Artificial Neural Network (Persian)]. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 5(4), 1-19. [DOI:10.22067/geo.v5i4.47594]
Heidarimozaffar, M., & TajBakhshian, M. (2022). [Zoning the vulnerability of Nahavand Settlements to Earthquakes (Persian)]. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 11(34), 57-78. [Link]
Khairi, A., Balafar, M., & Zamani, B. (2017). [Prediction of Tabriz fault earthquake using polynomial regression (Persian)]. Scientific Research Quarterly of Crisis Management, 10, 77-81. [Link]
Kazemi, M., Mahood, M., & Zafarani, H. (2021). [Magnitude and epicentral distance estimation from a single seismic record in the Alborz Region (Persian)]. Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering, 8(2), 1-7. [DOI:10.48303/bese.2021.244102]
Khodadadijid, Sh., & Porzinli, S. (2022). [Seismic zoning of Ardabil city using deterministic risk analysis and fuzzy system(Persian)]. Modares Civil Engineering Journal, 22(2), 57-74. [Link]
Pirizadeh, M., & Pirizadeh, M (2021). [Artificial intelligence applications in analyzing seismological data (Case study: Precursors data) (Persian)]. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge, 11(3), 299-309. [Link]
Soltanpour, H., Zaré, M., Moghimi, E., & Jafarbiglo, M. (2019).[Earthquake risk assessment in northwestern Tehran using Analytical Hierarchy process (AHP), case study: 22nd District (Persian)]. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge, 8(4), 373-386. [Link]
Al Banna, H., Abu Taher, K., Shamim Kaiser, M., Mufti, M., Sazzadur, R., & Sanwar, H., et al. (2020). Application of artificial intelligence in predicting earthquakes: State-of-the-art and future challenges. IEEE Access, 8, 192880 - 192923. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3029859]
Almaghrabi, M., & Chetty, G. (2020). Improving sentiment analysis in Arabic and English languages by using Multi-Layer Perceptron Model (MLP). Paper presented at: 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 06-09 October 2020. [DOI:10.1109/DSAA49011.2020.00095]
Apriani, M., Wijaya, S. K., & Daryono. (2021). Earthquake magnitude estimation based on machine learning: Application to earthquake early warning system. Paper presented at: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume 1951, International Symposium on Physics and Applications(ISPA 2020), Surabaya, Indonesia, 17-18 December 2020. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1951/1/012057]
Bhatia, M., Ahangar, T. A., & Manocha, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence based real-time earthquake prediction. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 120, 105856. [DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105856]
Feng, B., & Fox, G. C (2020). Spatiotemporal pattern mining for nowcasting extreme earthquakes in Southern California. arXiv, 2012.14336. [DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2012.14336]
Galkina, A., &Grafeeva, N. (2019). Machine learning methods for earthquake prediction: A survey. Paper presented at: The Fourth Conference on Software Engineering and Information Management, Saint Petersburg, Russia, April 2019. [Link]
Hagan, M. T., Demuth, H. B., Beale, M. H., & Jesús, O. D (2014). Neural Network Design. Retrieved from: [Link]
Lee, S., Ryu, J. H., Lee, M. J., & Won, J. S. (2006). The application of artificial neural networks to landslide susceptibility mapping at Janghung, Korea. Mathematical Geology, 38(2), 199220. [DOI:10.1007/s11004-005-9012-x]
Menhaj, M. (2009). [Fundamentals of neural networks (Persian)]. Tehran: Amirkabir University of Technology.
Mousavi, M., & Broza, G. (2023). Machine learning in earthquake seismology. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 51(1), 105-129. [Link]
Ramdhani, Y., Mustofa, H., Topiq, S., Alamsyah, D. P., Setiawan, S., & Susanti, L. (2022). Sentiment analysis Twitter based lexicon and multilayer perceptron Algorithm. Paper presented at: 10th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 20-21 September 2022. [DOI:10.1109/CITSM56380.2022.9936029]
Saad, O., Chen, Y., Savvaidis, A., Fomel, S., Jiang, X., & Huang, D., et al. (2023). Earthquake forecasting using big data and artificial intelligence: A 30week realtime case study in China. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 113(6), 2461–2478. [DOI:10.1785/0120230031]
Sayarpour, M. (1999). [Landslide risk potential zoning in the south of Khalkhal, Ardabil province (Persian)] [MA thesis]. Tehran: University of Tehran. [Link]
Vahabzde, M. (2023). [Risk zoning of skirts on Khalkhal road to Shahroud using artificial neural network system (Persian)] [MA thesis]. Ardabil:  University of Mohaghegh Ardabili.
Yan, J., Zeng, S., Tian, B., Cao, Y., Yang, W., & Zhu, F. (2023). Relationship between highway geometric characteristics and accident risk: A Multilayer Perceptron Model (MLP) Approach. Sustainability, 15(3), 1893. [DOI:10.3390/su15031893]
Yazarloo, R., & Bæy, A. (2023). [Prediction of induced earthquakes caused by dam construction by artificial neural network (Persian). Paper presented at:  The First National Conference on New Technologies in Energy Consumption and sustainable Urban Planning in Civil Engineering and Architacture, Golestan, Iran, 10 May 2023. [Link]
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/03/14 | Accepted: 2024/06/9 | ePublished: 2024/09/18

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge (quarterly)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb