Write your message
Volume 13, Issue 4 (Winter 2024)                   Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2024, 13(4): 490-507 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Alipouri E, Nami M H, Naderi M. An Overview of the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies in Disaster Management (with an Emphasis on Natural Hazards). Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2024; 13 (4) :490-507
URL: http://dpmk.ir/article-1-657-en.html
1- Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Farabi University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
3- Depeartment of Rempte Sensing (GIS), Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 9205 kb]   (924 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2528 Views)
Full-Text:   (577 Views)
Introduction
Iemote sensing yields valuable data for various aspects of hazard management, including early warning systems, damage assessment, and resource allocation. This aids in monitoring and predicting natural hazards, evaluating their impact, and facilitating efficient response and recovery efforts. Often, the adoption of new technologies is driven by the imperative to rapidly gather critical information for disaster management, enabling emergency responders to assess the impact of major disasters more efficiently and monitor recovery and response operations’ progress. 
Examples of technology implementation during significant disasters, such as Hurricane Andrew in 1992 and the 1994 Northridge earthquake, showcased the potential use of GIS for damage assessment and recovery. Similarly, Hurricane Charley in 2004 demonstrated the effectiveness of GPS-based field navigation technologies in mitigating damage and destruction in a timely manner.
These events underscore the importance of utilizing time-critical information for making crucial decisions during disasters. Remote sensing stands out as a technology with a significant impact on risk management over the past decade. Leveraging high-spatial resolution optical imagery and active sensors like synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and LiDAR, remote sensing technology plays a vital role in quantifying post-disaster damage, monitoring recovery progress, and developing information about urban infrastructure. 
One of the main drivers behind this rapid development has been the availability of commercially accessible high spatial resolution satellite imagery, which was previously primarily accessible to government agencies, notably military entities. The impact of this technology on risk management has been remarkably significant. This paper concentrates on assessing the efficacy of remote sensing technologies across all aspects of hazard management, encompassing preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery. 
To illustrate the effectiveness of remote sensing across these four areas, historical cases and recent examples of hazards such as the Marmara Earthquake in Turkey, the Bam Earthquake in Iran, and the Indian Ocean Earthquake and Tsunami have been examined. Additionally, the paper briefly discusses potential future directions for remote sensing in hazard management, exploring both advancements and challenges in realizing its broader application in future hazards. 

Methods 
To elucidate the effectiveness of remote sensing technology in risk management, particularly concerning inventory development, damage estimation, and field surveying, this research focuses on the cities of Marmara in Turkey, Bam in Iran, and the Indian Ocean region. These areas experienced extensive damage due to earthquakes in 1999, 2003, and 2004 respectively. The research methodology employed here is library-analytical. By reviewing existing studies and research in the field of risk management and analyzing their findings, the paper elucidates the role of remote sensing across all aspects of crisis management, including preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery.

Results 
This study evaluated and investigated the capability of remote sensing technology, along with satellite imagery, in all aspects of crisis management, including preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery. Specifically, it focused on inventory development, instantaneous damage estimation, and field diagnosis. Analysis of the results revealed that remote sensing technology demonstrates significant efficiency in assessing damage post-disaster, monitoring post-disaster recovery and reconstruction progress, and gathering information about urban infrastructure. In terms of inventory development, compiling a comprehensive and accurate database of critical infrastructures proves effective in estimating actual damages post-hazard occurrence. Moreover, in the context of mitigation and preparedness, there’s an increasing demand for precise inventories of the built environment to conduct vulnerability assessments, estimate repair costs, assess insurer liability, and aid in relief planning. A significant advantage of remote sensing inventories lies in their relatively easy updating, particularly crucial at the city level scale, where satellite imagery provides an overview for planning departments to monitor urban growth, especially regarding damages caused by urban settlements and critical infrastructure like roads, pipelines, and bridges. Immediate damage detection after a hazard, whether natural or man-made, initiates the response process by providing crucial information to prioritize relief efforts, direct first responders to critical locations, and optimize response time and initial damage estimation. The analysis revealed that damage estimation can be approached through direct and indirect methods. In the direct approach, damage is detected by observing object characteristics or temporal changes, while in the indirect approach, damage is identified through surrogate markers. GPS-based technologies have significantly improved field detection efforts after major disasters. Traditional post-disaster damage assessment methods typically involve manual field surveys, where damage indicators are recorded in spreadsheets along with general damage states. However, the use of GPS-based systems has shown to significantly expedite land mapping data collection processes.

Conclusion 
In recent decades, remote sensing technology has seen extensive use in quantifying the impact of earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, floods, forest fires, and terrorist attacks. This research focused on utilizing remote sensing technologies for natural hazard management in Marmara, Turkey; Bam, Iran; and the Indian Ocean, aiming to enhance human understanding of the built environment’s vulnerability to such hazards and improve assessment methods for their impact on urban areas. The findings of this research demonstrate that remote sensing technology, leveraging high-resolution satellite imagery, can effectively contribute to all facets of crisis management. It enables the creation of comprehensive databases documenting building existence before and after natural hazards, aiding in the explanation of damages incurred. However, the accessibility of high-resolution satellite images often comes with a cost, posing a limitation on their widespread use in natural hazard management. This financial aspect should be carefully considered by experts and planners in this field.

Ethical Considerations

Compliance with ethical guidelines

There were no ethical considerations to be considered in this research.

Funding
This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

Authors' contributions
All authors equally contribute to preparing all parts of the research.

Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.





References
Adams, B. J., & Huyck, C. K. (2006). The emerging role of remote sensing technology in emergency management. Infrastructure Risk Management Processes: Natural, Accidental, and Deliberate Hazards, 95-117. [Link]
Adams, B., Huyck, C., Mansouri, B., Eguchi, R., & Shinozuka, M. (2002). Post-disaster bridge damage assessment. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 15th Pecora Conference: Integrating Remote Sensing at the Global, Regional, and Local Scale, Denver, Colorado, May 2002. [Link]
Adams, B. J., Huyck, C. K., Mio, M., Sungbin, C., Ghosh, S., & Chung, H. C., et al. (2004). The Bam (Iran) Earthquake of December 26, 2003: Preliminary reconnaissance using remotely sensed data and the views (visualizing the impacts of earthquakes with satellite images) system. New York: MCEER. [Link]
Adams, B. J., Huyck, C. K., Mio, M. Z., Cho, S., Eguchi, R. T., & Womble, A. J. et al. (2004). Streamlining post-disaster data collection and damage assessment, using VIEWS (Visualizing Impacts of Earthquakes with Satellites) and VRS (Virtual Reconnaissance System). Paper presented at: Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Remote Sensing for Post-Disaster Response, Newport Beach, California, October 7-8; 2004. [Link]
Architectural Institute of Japan. (1999). Report on the damage investigation of the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake in Turkey. Tokyo: Architectural Institute of Japan.
Aoki, H., Matsuoka, M., & Yamazaki, F. (1998). Characteristics of Satellite SAR images in the damaged areas due to the Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake. Proceedings of the 1998 Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 7, 1-6. [Link]
Cahan, B., & Ball, M. (2002). GIS at Ground Zero- Spatial Technology Bolsters World Trade Center Response and Recovery. GEO WORLD, 15, 26-29. [Link]
Chang, S. E., Adams, B. J., Alder, J., Berke, P. R., Chuenpagdee, R., & Ghosh, S., et al. (2006). Coastal ecosystems and tsunami protection after the December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Earthquake Spectra, 22(3_suppl), 863-887. [DOI:10.1193/1.2201971]
Chiroiu, L. (2005). Damage assessment of the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake using Ikonos imagery. Earthquake Spectra, 21(1_suppl), 219-224. [DOI:10.1193/1.2119227]
Chiroiu, L., & Andre, G. (2001). Damage assessment using high resolution satellite imagery: Application to 2001 Bhuj, India Earthquake. Proceeding of 7th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1-13. [Link]
Chiroiu, L. (2002). Earthquake damage assessment using high resolution satellite imagery. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2002, EERI. Boston, Massachusetts, USA, July 21 - 25; 2002. [Link]
Sarabandi, P., Chung, H. C., & Adams, B. J. (2006). Remote sensing for building inventory updates in disaster management. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the Smart Structures and Materials and NDE for Health Monitoring and Diagnostics Conference, San Diego, USA, 16 March; 2006. [DOI:10.1117/12.661020]
Eguchi, R., Huyck, C., Houshmand, B., Mansouri, B., Shinozuka, M., & Yamazaki, F., et al. (2000). The Marmara earthquake: A view from space. In: C. Charles (Ed.), The Marmara, Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999: Reconnaissance report. Buffalo, New York, U.S. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), Mar. 2000. (pp.151-69), ilus, tab. (Technical Report MCEER, 00-0001). [Link]
Eguchi, R., Huyck, C., Houshmand, B., Mansouri, B., Shinozuka, M., & Yamazaki, F., et al. (2000). The Marmara, Turkey Earthquake: Using advanced technology to conduct earthquake reconnaissance. Research Progress and Accomplishments 1999-2000. [Link]
Estrada, M., Kohiyama, M., Matsuoka, M. & Yamazaki, F. (2001). Detection of damage due to the 2001 El Salvador Earthquake using landsat images. Paper presented at: The 22nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Singapore, 5-9 November 2001. [Link]
Estrada, M. (2001). Digital damage detection due to the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey Earthquake. Bulletin of the Earthquake Resistant Structure Research Center, University of Tokyo, 34, 55-66. [Link]
Gusella, L., Adams, B. J., Bitelli, G., Huyck, C. K., & Mognol, A. (2005). Object oriented image understanding and post-earthquake damage assessment for Bam, Iran, Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 21(S1), 225-238. [DOI:10.1193/1.2098629]
Hasegawa, H., Aoki, H., Yamazaki, F. & Sekimoto, I. (1999). Attempt for automated detection of damaged buildings using aerial HDTV images. Proceedings of the 20th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 1, 97-102. [Link]
Hasegawa, H., Yamazaki, F., Matsuoka, M., & Sekimoto, I. (2000). Determination of building damage due to earthquakes using aerial television images. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1722(8), 1-8. [Link]
Hashitera, S., Kohiyama, M., Maki, N., & Fujita, H. (1999). Use of DMSP-OLS images for early identification of impacted areas due to the 1999 Marmara earthquake disaster. Proceedings of the 20th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 2, 1291-1296. [Link]
Hutchinson, T. C., & Chen, Z. (2005). Optimized estimated ground truth for object-based urban damage estimation using satellite images from the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 21(1_suppl), 239-254. [DOI:10.1193/1.2098937]
Huyck, C.K, Mansouri, B., Eguchi, R.T., Houshmand, B., Castner, L. & Shinozuka, M. (2002). Methodologies for post-Earthquake Damage Detection Algorithms Using Optical and ERS-SAR Satellite Data – Application to the August 17, 1999 Marmara, Turkey Earthquake. Proceedings of the 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston.
Huyck, C. K., & Adams, B. J. (2002). Emergency response in the wake of the World Trade Center Attack: The remote sensing perspective. Buffalo: MCEER. [Link]
Huyck, C. K., Adams, B. J., & Kehrlein, D. I. (2003). An evaluation of the role played by remote sensing technology following the World Trade Center attack. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2(1), 159–168. [DOI:10.1007/BF02857548]
Kohiyama, M., Hayashi, H., Maki, N., & Hashitera, S. (2001). Night time damage estimation. retrieved from: [Link]
Matsuoka, M., & Yamazaki, F. (2000). Interferometric characterization of areas damaged by the 1995 Kobe earthquake using satellite SAR images. Proceedings of the 12thWorld Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2, 1-8. [Link]
Matsuoka, M., & Yamazaki, F. (1998). Identification of damaged areas due to the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake using satellite optical images. Proceedings of the 19th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 9, 1-6. [Link]
Matsuoka, M., & Yamazaki, F. (2000b). Satellite Remote Sensing of Damaged Areas Due to the 1995 Kobe earthquake. In: K. Toki (Ed), Confronting urban earthquakes: Report of fundamental research on the mitigation of urban disasters caused by near-field earthquakes (pp. 259-262). Kyoto: Kyoto University. [Link]
Matsuoka, M., & Yamazaki, F. (2003). Application of a methodology for detection building-damage area to recent earthquakes using SAR intensity images. Proceedings of the 7th EERI US Japan Conference on Urban Earthquake Hazard Reduction, Maui. [Link]
Mitomi, H., Matsuoka, M., & Yamazaki, F. (2002). Application of automated damage detection of buildings due to earthquakes by panchromatic television images. Proceedings of the 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1-10. [Link]
Mitomi, H., Saita, J., Matsuoka, M., & Yamazaki, F. (2001). Automated damage detection of buildings from aerial television images of the 2001 Gujarat, India earthquake. Paper presented at: IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 09-13 July 2001. [Link]
Mitomi, H., Yamazaki, F. & Matsuoka, M. (2001). Development of automated extraction method for buildings damage area based on maximum likelihood classifier. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, 1-8. [Link]
Morain, S., &  Kraft, W. (2003). Remote sensing for transportation—products and results: Foundations for the future.  [Link]
Ogawa, N., & Yamazaki, F. (2000). Photo-interpretation of buildings damage due to earthquakes using aerial photographs. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1-8. [Link]
Ogawa, N. (1999). Earthquake Damage Survey methods based on airborne HDTV, photography and SAR. Proceedings of the 5th US Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, 322-331. [Link]
Rathje, E. M., Crawford, M., Woo, K., & Neuenschwander, A. (2005). Damage patterns from satellite images of the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 21(1_suppl), 295-307.[DOI:10.1193/1.2101047]
Saito, K., Spence, R., & De C Foley, T. A. (2005). Visual damage assessment using high-resolution satellite images following the 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 21(S1). [Link]
Sarabandi, P., Adams, B., Kiremidjian, A. S., & Eguchi, R. T. (2005). Infrastructure inventory compilation using single high resolution satellite images. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Remote Sensing for Post-Disaster Response, Chiba University, Japan, 12-13 September, 2005.  [Link]
Sinha, R., & Goyal, A. (2001). Lessons from Bhuj Earthquake. Retrieved from: [Link]
Tralli, D. M. (2000). Assessment of advanced technologies for loss estimation. New York: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo. [Link]
Williamson, R. A. (2002). Remote sensing for transportation security. Retrieved from: [Link]
Womble, A. J., Ghosh, S., Friedland, C. J., & Adams, B. J. (2008). Hurricane Katrina. Volume 2. Remote sensing. Advance damage detection for hurricane Katrina: Integrating remote sensing VIEWS. Field reconnaissance. Geneva: UNDRR. [Link]
Yamazaki, F. (2001). Applications of remote sensing and GIS for damage assessment. Structural Safety and Reliability, 1, 1-12. [Link]
Yamazaki, F., Yano, Y., & Matsuoka, M. (2005). Visual Damage Interpretation of Buildings in Bam City using QuickBird Images following the 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake, Earthquake Spectra, 21(S1). [DOI:10.1193/1.2101807]
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/01/17 | Accepted: 2024/01/20 | ePublished: 2024/02/29

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge (quarterly)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb